Identifying the case studies
To generate a longlist of potential case study regions that were historically similar to the North East we analysed performance against three key indicators of inclusive productivity. The three indicators were chosen because they represent key aspects of inclusive productivity and data was consistently available for most OECD regions. They were:
- Gross Domestic Product per head in constant prices and constant purchasing power parities – a measure of productivity that takes account of the differences in inflation rates and spending power between countries
- Economic activity rate – a measure of regional differences in labour market participation among the working age population
- Disosable household income per head, in constant prices and constant purchasing power parities – a measure of income inequality that takes account of the differences in inflation rates and spending power between countries.
The first stage of identifying case studies looked at each region’s performance in the period 2003 to 2008 and their position in 2008. This period was chosen to represent a period against which more recent performance could subsequently be compared, with the endpoint of 2008 roughly coinciding with the global financial crisis.
Due to data availability we compared performance to North East England including Tees Valley. Other regions whose performance was within ten percentiles of North East England on two or more indicators were longlisted as potential case studies. This process identified 136 regions in 28 countries.
The second stage looked at longlisted regions’ performance from 2008 to 2018. This period was chosen to identify regions that had outperformed the North East on key inclusive productivity indicators since the global financial crisis. The cut-off point of 2018 was chosen to avoid the risk of skewing the analysis due to the more recent impacts of the Covid 19 pandemic.
You can explore the North East's and the longlisted regions performance since 2008 on these three indicators below. The charts show since 2008 North East England has had a similar level of economic activity among its residents, but the North East has lower GDP per head and disposable income.